Cases 1 - 10 of 10,813
KING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEO KING, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
PROGRESS BROKERAGE GROUP LLC et al v. HISCOX INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2024cv01785
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE BROKERAGE GROUP LLC and EDWARD E. SNOW
Defendant:
HISCOX INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Burnsworth v. Sellers et al
as 2:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Max Burnsworth
Defendant:
Trent Alexander Sellers, Brian Edward Ries, Justin Matthew DePalma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPALONEY, JR. v. ROSEBUD MINING COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Edward Chapaloney, Jr.
Defendant:
ROSEBUD MINING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bolich v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Edward Bolich
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Fordyce v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Edward Fordyce
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
