Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLemore v. Frakes
as 8:2018cv00567
Petitioner:
Michael Edwin McLemore
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carleton v. Chapman Merger & Acquisitions Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Edwin Carleton
Defendant:
Carleton Transport Service, Inc. and Chapman Merger & Acquisitions Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Chamul v. USA
as 8:2017cv00300
Petitioner:
Edwin Javier Chamul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JDR Industries, Inc. v. McDowell et al
as 8:2014cv00284
Plaintiff:
JDR Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
LaGrange Supply Co, L.L.C. and Edwin K. McDowell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chamul v. USA
as 8:2014cv00086
Petitioner:
Edwin Javier Chamul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Manche et al v. Meis
as 8:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edwin L. Manche and Marla D. Manche
Defendant:
Jean M. Meis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Goss et al
as 8:2012mc00045
Defendant:
Charlene Kay Bolter-Goss and Martin Edwin Goss
Plaintiff:
North American Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Chase Bank USA v. Poloncic
as 8:2008mc00034
Plaintiff:
Chase Bank USA
Defendant:
Derek Edwin Poloncic
Hartley et al v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. et al
as 8:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hartley and Michelle Hartley
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Corporation, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
