Cases 1 - 10 of 149
KITCHEN v. CHAN et al
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY KITCHEN
Defendant:
ELBERT CHAN, 7248 ADULT DAY CARE, INC. doing business as ASSURED CARE CENTER DAYCARE and 7248 HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FEAGIN v. TRENT
as 3:2020cv00057
Defendant:
GARRETT TRENT
Plaintiff:
ELBERT D. FEAGIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robinson v. MERCK & CO, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01569
Defendant:
MERCK & CO, INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
Elbert Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEVINE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv04652
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., NURSE JANE DOE 2, MONTGOMERY COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ELBERT DEVINE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SCI HUNTINGDON PA. 16654-1112 et al
as 2:2018cv04348
Petitioner:
ELBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCI HUNTINGDON PA. 16654-1112 and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENDRIX et al v. DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
as 2:2018cv03782
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HENDRIX and ELBERT G. HENDRIX, JR.
Defendant:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF AMERICAN HOMEOWNER PRESERVATION TRUST SERIES 2014B et al v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv02285
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF AMERICAN HOMEOWNER PRESERVATION TRUST SERIES 2014B
Defendant:
ELBERT T. FERGUSON and ENOCH AZEEZ ALEEM BEY
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MOODY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELBERT v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2017cv05192
Plaintiff:
CARLEY M ELBERT
Defendant:
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
