Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Salazar Otero v. Garland
as 23-222
Petitioner:
ELEAZAR SALAZAR OTERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
U.S. Bank National Association v. Eleazar Salazar
as 12-55687
Appellant:
ELEAZAR SALAZAR
Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00907
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Qian Zhao, et al v. Robert Adams, et al
as 10-60312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QIAN ZHAO, SHIRAZ SYED QAZI, SALEEMULLAH SHERISS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT ADAMS, Warden of Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility in Mississippi and KENNETH LANDGREBE, Field Office Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-60149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhao et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Qian Ibrahim Zhao, Shiraz Syed Qazi, Saleemullah Sheriss and others
Defendant:
Robert Adams and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00319
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Salazar
Defendant:
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., Litton Loan Servicing, Inc., Quality Loan Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-60023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhao et al v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv04133
Plaintiff:
Qian Ibrahim Zhao, Shiraz Syed Qazi, Saleemullah Sheriss and others
Defendant:
Robert Adams and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
