Cases 1 - 10 of 376
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PDL BIOPHARMA, INC. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
PDL Biopharma, Inc.
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COMBS v. ELIS et al
as 1:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
ELIS, REAGLE, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BARLEY v. ELI LILLY, INC
as 1:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
BILL L. BARLEY
Defendant:
ELI LILLY, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DIGENIS v. HALLAL et al
as 4:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER G DIGENIS and ALEXANDER G. DIGENIS, M.D.
Defendant:
ELI R HALLAL, SUSAN P HALLAL, ELI R. HALLAL M.D. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
