Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Stevens v. Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-5343
Petitioner - Appellee: Edward Stevens
Respondent - Appellant: David Miller, AKA William Brown and Eric T. Schneiderman, AKA Eliot Spitzer
Commack Self-Service Kosher v. Spitzer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3517
Plaintiff - Appellant: Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc., DBA Commack Kosher, DBA Commack Kosher Deli and Market
Defendant - Appellee: Eliot Spitzer, Governor of the State of New York, Patrick Hooker, Commisioner of the Department of Agriculture and Market of the State of New York and Weiss Luzer, Rabbi, Director of the Kosher Law Enforcement Division, Department of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York
Gilman v. Spitzer et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv05843
Plaintiff: William Gilman
Defendant: Eliot Spitzer and The Slate Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flemming v. The City of New York Police De
as 11-2164
Plaintiff: Ruthie Flemming, Wife, Power of Attorney
Plaintiff - Appellant: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant - Appellee: The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y., One Police Plaza, Police Commissioner, individually and his capacity as and employee of the City of New York as an agent 11/10/99., Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, the Capitol, individually and his capacIty as an employee of an agent for the City of New York City and Bronx County, New York 11/10/99. and others
Mental Hygiene Legal Services v. Paterson
as 11-1539
Plaintiff - Appellee: Mental Hygiene Legal Services
Defendant: Eliot Spitzer, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Diana Jones Ritter, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Mahmoud A. Mamdani and others
Defendant - Appellant: Eric T. Schneiderman, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Andrew Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Michael Hogan, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health and others
Flemming v. The City of New York Police De
as 11-987
Plaintiff: Ruthie Flemming
Plaintiff - Appellant: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant - Appellee: The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y., One Police Plaza, Police Commissioner, individually and his capacity as and employee of the City ofNew York as an agent 11/10/99., Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, the Capitol, individually and his capacIty as an employee of an agent for the City of new York City and Bronx County, New York 11/10/99. and others
King v. Cuomo
as 11-345
Plaintiff: Burris Avant, Jose Santos, Jeffrey Watkins and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Richard King, Daniel Rivera, Jose Otero and others
Defendant - Appellee: Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo, in his personal and official capacities, Eliot Spitzer, in his personal capacity as former Attorney General and in his personal capacity as former Governor, Commissioner Brian Fischer, Department of Correctional Services in his official and individual capacities and others
Combier v. State of New York
as 10-4879
Plaintiff - Appellant: Elizabeth Combier
Defendant: Theodore Prudon, in his professional capacity, in his individual capacity
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, Kenneth Wasserman, in his official capacity, in his individual capacity and others
Flemming v. The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y. et al
as 1:2010cv08805
Plaintiff: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant: The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y., One Police Plaza, Eliot Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabricio v. Artu
as 10-4592
Petitioner - Appellant: Ederick Fabricio
Respondent - Appellee: Dale Artus and Eliot Spitzer, New York State Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?