Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Longshaw v. Chinn-Gary
as 3:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Michael Longshaw
Defendant:
Elisa Chinn-Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuels v. McFadden et al
as 3:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Byron Lamar Samuels, Jr
Defendant:
Garry McFadden, Roy Cooper, Kristin Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandace Rosevelt:Hopper v. State of North Carolina
as 22-1846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDACE JARREAU ROSEVELT:HOPPER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, LAWRENCE BLAKE, d/b/a Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., HUTCHENS LAW FIRM and others
Rosevelt: Hopper v. State of NC et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brandace Jarreau Rosevelt: Hopper
Defendant:
State of NC, Lawrence W. Blake doing business as Substitute Trustee Services Inc., Hutchens Law Firm LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valerie Arroyo v. Vi Lyles
as 21-1669
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE DUNLAP, Commissioner, MECKLENBURG COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO
Valerie Arroyo v. Vi Lyles
as 21-1052
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE DUNLAP, Commissioner, MECKLENBURG COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO
Arroyo v. Lyles et al
as 3:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Court of Administration of Mecklenburg County, Spencer Merriweather, Mecklenburg County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wilson-Dye et al v. Chinn-Gary et al
as 3:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Sharon Victoria Wilson-Dye and Darrell Dye
Defendant:
Elisa Chinn-Gary, Jeremy B. Wilkins, Brian Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Crowder v. Hoose et al
as 3:2016cv00773
Plaintiff:
Robert L Crowder, Jr
Defendant:
Randall Hoose, Melissa Rivenbark, Chip Pennell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
