Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 21-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th President of the United States
Defendant / Appellee:
Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Virginia Canter, Richard Painter and others
Garcia v. Hoke
as 17-3108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Hoke, Elizabeth Holtzman and Robert Abrams
Garcia v. Hoke
as 1:1988cv02635
Defendant:
Robert Abrams, Robert Hoke and Elizabeth Holtzman
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Kahn et al
as 6:2013cv01421
Plaintiff:
Justo Richards
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Kahn, Glenn T. Suddaby, Thomas J. McAvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Nader, et al v. Democratic National Committee, et al
as 08-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ralph Nader, Peter Miguel Camejo, D. B. Fanning and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Democratic National Committee, Kerry-Edwards 2004 Inc., Ballot Project, Inc. and others
Caroselli v. Curci et al
as 1:2008cv01743
Plaintiff:
Dino Caroselli
Defendant:
Michael Curci, Plummer E. Lott, Reinoldo E. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NADER et al v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2007cv02136
Plaintiff:
RALPH NADER, PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO, D.B. FANNING and others
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, KERRY-EDWARDS 2004 INC., BALLOT PROJECT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
