Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Huricks v. Sumner et al
as 9:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Timothy Donald Huricks
Respondent:
Misty Sumner, Angie Cargill, Elizabeth Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huricks v. Sumner et al
as 4:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Donald Huricks
Defendant:
Misty Sumner, Angie Cargill, Elizabeth Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conn Appliances, Inc. v. Miller
as 3:2019cv00285
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth Miller
Petitioner:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Conn Appliances Inc
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Conn Appliances, Inc. v. Miller
as 3:2019xc00283
Respondent:
Mary Elizabeth Miller
Petitioner:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Miller et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jim Miller and Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnny Edwards v. Elizabeth Miller, et al
as 09-40998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY LYNN EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH MILLER, ANGIE CARGILLE and WESLEY PRATT
Perry v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Rayford F Perry
Defendant:
Pamela Kirkpatrick, Tennie Griffin, Wesley Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Miller et al
as 6:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lynn Edwards
Defendant:
Elizabeth Miller, Angie Cargille and Wesley Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Merastar Insurance Company
as 1:2008cv00636
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Merastar Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
