Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Enloe v. Krohn et al
as 2:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Enloe and Joshua James Enloe
Defendant:
Matthew M. Krohn, Brian Keedy, Kevin Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gay v. Shaffer
as 2:2019cv01471
Defendant:
Timothy O'Hara, Kenneth Allen, Elizabeth Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Sharrieff Gay v. Jennifer Shaffer
as 2:2019cv06402
Defendant:
Timothy O'Hara, Kenneth Allen, Elizabeth Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Hawk v. CDCR, et al
as 16-16885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, FORENSIC ASSESSMENT DIVISION and others
Rosser v. Schaffer et al
as 1:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
Larry Rosser
Defendant:
Jennifer Schaffer, Elizabeth Richardson, Patricia Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. Brown, et al.
as 2:2015cv01548
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Prison Hearings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dollar v. Newnan Times-Herald et al
as 3:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Dollar
Defendant:
Newnan Times-Herald, Elizabeth Richardson and William Thomason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maimona v. Board of Prison Terms et al
as 3:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Daniel Maimona
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms, Elizabeth Richardson and Sandra Bryson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
