Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2020cv02025
Defendant:
DANIEL M. LINES, RACHEL L. RODDY, JACLYN SERSLAND and others
Plaintiff:
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv01811
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH S. JOHNSON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker v. Beckley et al
as 1:2019cv00255
Plaintiff:
Alexander Parker
Defendant:
John Doe, Magisterial District, Ninth Judicial District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carignan v. Beckley et al
as 1:2017cv02161
Plaintiff:
Gregg R. Carignan
Defendant:
Elizabeth S. Beckley and Cumberland County PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAKE et al v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2016cv03893
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, MARGARET T. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHITO et al v. HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY
as 2:2014cv01576
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R. CHITO and ELIZABETH S. KESNER
Defendant:
HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DINGLE v. PFIZER INC.
as 2:2014cv01135
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH S. DINGLE
Defendant:
PFIZER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2012cv02273
Plaintiff:
TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DANIEL JAMES JOHNSON, J. MICHAEL JOHNSON, KIM JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chief Exploration & Development, LLC v. Ordie Price's Sawmill, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01821
Plaintiff:
Chief Exploration & Development, LLC
Defendant:
Ordie Price's Sawmill, Inc., Roger D Bennett and Elizabeth S. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S. et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2011cv01570
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH S. and SHAWN J.
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
