Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Ellison v. Maciejewski
as 2:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Ellison
Defendant:
Dylan Maciejewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv15167
Plaintiff:
Dayton Ellison
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Unknown Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford, Bennie et al v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Bennie Stafford and Debra Mitchell
Respondent:
Tony Evers, Wis.Attorney Gen. Josh Kaul, Wis. Chief U.S. Atty. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ellison v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Dionte Ellison
Defendant:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ellison v. Finley et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Bennie K. Ellison
Defendant:
Craig Finley, Christina Batson, Kevin Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Ellison v. USA
as 22-1355
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW J. ELLISON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Goodvine v. Duckert et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Commander Duckert, Deputy Commander Dobson, Captain Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Ellison v. USA
as 22-1164
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW J. ELLISON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ELLISON v. WATSON et al
as 1:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ELLISON
Defendant:
ERIC WATSON and DASHAWN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes et al v. Westville Correctional Facility
as 3:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Vincent W Boyd, Brandon Rhodes, Vincent Boyd and others
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
