Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Bradley v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
as 6:2026cv00191
Plaintiff:
Devin Bradley
Defendant:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Garceau v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Garceau
Defendant:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Doe v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michaels v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc.
as 6:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Marianne Michaels
Defendant:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1711 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lopez v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Guillermina Lopez
Defendant:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
