Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Emerson v. Spring Hill Suites et al
as 4:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Emerson
Defendant:
Spring Hill Suites, Cody Sell and Tim Scaddt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson Electric Co. et al v. SIPCO LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Emerson Electric Co. , Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. and Rosemount Inc.
Defendant:
SIPCO LLC and IP Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Montauk U.S.A., LLC v. 148 South Emerson Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv04075
Plaintiff:
Montauk U.S.A., LLC
Defendant:
148 South Emerson Associates, LLC, Michael Meyer, Michael Meagher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Stephen Agnone , Enzo Agnone , Douglas Porcelli and others
Defendant:
Camden County, Georgia , Willis R. Keene, Jr. , Jimmy Starline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mills v. Stone
as 3:2013cv00070
Petitioner:
Everette Emerson Mills
Respondent:
Stacey Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Emerson Electric Co. et al v. SIPCO LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02528
Plaintiff:
Emerson Electric Co. , Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. and Rosemount Inc.
Defendant:
SIPCO LLC and IP Co., LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Greater Northern Insurance Co. v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 1:2012cv02775
Plaintiff:
Greater Northern Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co. and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rudd et al v. Emerson Electric Co.
as 1:2011cv03961
Plaintiff:
Armin Rudd and The University of Central Florida Board of Trustees
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co.
Movant:
Rheem Manufacturing Company
Rudd et al v. Emerson Electric Co.
as 1:2011mi00110
Plaintiff:
Armin Rudd and The University of Central Florida Board of Trustees
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co.
Movant:
Rheem Manufacturing Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
