Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Richard v. 13th J D C et al
as 6:2025cv00957
Plaintiff:
Emile Joseph Richard
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Justin West, Kelly P Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 0:2025cv00893
Plaintiff:
Emile Joseph
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America Auto Trust 2023-1, Rudy Luther Hopkins Honda and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Richard v. Louisiana et al
as 6:2021cv03647
Defendant:
13th Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana, Police Dept of Mamou and others
Plaintiff:
Emile Joseph Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Emil Joseph
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION and Hess Oil New York Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lapoint v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06494
Plaintiff:
Emile Joseph Lapoint
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Sayun L. Andruss et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as CAC/8:18-cv-00943
Plaintiff:
Sayun L. Andruss , Thomas Anderson , Melendy A. Baham and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc and Does
Sayun L. Andruss et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00943
Plaintiff:
Thomas Anderson, Sayun L. Andruss, Melendy A. Baham and others
Defendant:
Does and Equifax Inc
Martin et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Demarco Martin , Ralph Weatherspoon , Albert Zachery and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ekdahl v. Diaz
as 1:2013cv00542
Petitioner:
Emil Joseph Ekdahl
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ekdahl v. Diaz
as 2:2013cv00378
Petitioner:
Emil Joseph Ekdahl
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
