Cases 31 - 40 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
IGNATYEV et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01547
Plaintiff:
MIKHAIL IGNATYEV and NATALIYA PETROVNA DEMIDCHIK
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MIAN v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01476
Plaintiff:
RAHEELA GHAZANFAR MIAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USMAN v. UPCHURCH et al
as 2:2008cv01443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED HARIS UMER USMAN
Defendant:
EVELYN UPCHURCH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DESAI et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01470
Plaintiff:
GOPESH DESAI and PREETI DESAI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, GERALD HEINAUER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SAEED et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01294
Plaintiff:
TAHIR SAEED, NAILA SAEED and DANYALL SAEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL L. AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
