Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Whipple v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv05137
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whipple
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allan v. Piper
as 0:2017cv05131
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Lavack et al
as 3:2017cv01378
Plaintiff:
Emily Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Lavack , URS Midwest, Inc. and Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Semler v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv04663
Petitioner:
Raymond L. Semler
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnesota R-80 Medical Transportation Coalition et al v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv04539
Plaintiff:
Minnesota R-80 Medical Transportation Coalition and Minnesota Ambulance Association
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper and Don Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Hausfeld v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Brian Hausfeld
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Emily Johnson Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friend v. Johnson Piper
as 0:2017cv04356
Petitioner:
Terrance J. Friend
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linehan v. Piper
as 0:2017cv04355
Petitioner:
Dennis D. Linehan
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Doranti v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv03900
Plaintiff:
Sarprio B. Doranti
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, St. Peter State Hospital, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wong v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wong
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Robert Rose, Brian Ninneman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
