Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Semotuk v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03255
Plaintiff:
Daniel Semotuk
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Sentence Calculation Board, Winfield Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Conover
as 5:2012cv03167
Plaintiff:
Spencer L. Lindsay
Defendant:
Emmalee Conover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krider v. Conover
as 12-3108
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES CHRISTIAN KRIDER
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMALEE CONOVER, Warden, Winfield Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Krider v. Conover et al
as 5:2011cv03010
Petitioner:
Charles Christian Krider
Respondent:
Emmalee Conover and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lindsay v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv03175
Plaintiff:
Spencer L. Lindsay
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Roger Werholtz, Emmalee Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsay v. Conover et al
as 5:2009cv03257
Petitioner:
Spencer L. Lindsay
Respondent:
Emmalee Conover and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv03242
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Caldwell
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Roger Werholtz, Sam Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Conover et al
as 5:2009cv03207
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Burton
Defendant:
Emmalee Conover and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cremer et al v. Conover et al
as 5:2009cv03200
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cremer and Steven R. Burton
Defendant:
Emmalee Conover and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElfish v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2009cv03147
Plaintiff:
Mark R. McElfish
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Deane W. Donley and Emmalee Conover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
