Cases 1 - 10 of 274
English v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Kristin English
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
CORDARREL ENGLISH
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karnas et al v. McCarter & English, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv20480
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garrison, Dominik Karnas, Rahil Sayed and others
Defendant:
McCarter & English, LLP, National Basketball Association, Inc., Ketchum Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 0:2023cv62309
Plaintiff:
Tommy Yesbick
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. DOSEK et al
as 3:2023cv24733
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JACKSON
Defendant:
DOSEK, MICHOT, GUNNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 3:2023cv24735
Petitioner:
TOMMY YESBICK
Respondent:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HINES v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Robert Hines
Defendant:
Valerie Jones, Christopher Dille, Tyler Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
