Cases 51 - 58 of 58
SLADE v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2008cv76866
Plaintiff:
BENTON T. SLADE
Defendant:
CRANE CO., GARLOCK, INC., MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Slade v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Benton T. Slade
Defendant:
Crane Co., Garlock, Inc., Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Holmes v. FMC Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv01150
Plaintiff:
Charles Holmes
Defendant:
FMC Corp., Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company, Enpro Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HUDSON et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv65976
Plaintiff:
LINDA HUDSON and SHARON HUDSON
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Watson v. Hopeman Brothers et al
as 1:2007cv00468
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Watson and Richard L. Watson
Defendant:
Hopeman Brothers, S B Decking, Inc., Enpro Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Reeves v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Reeves, Robert L. Reeves, Robert L. Reeves and others
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., AGCO Corporation, AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Duncan et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 0:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Milton Duncan, Milton Duncan, Milton Duncan and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Aqua-Chem Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
IMO Industries Inc
Cross Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Aurora Pump Company, Buffalo Pumps Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
