Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Daly v. Efferth et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Heather Daly
Defendant:
Halley Efferth, Emily Zilavy, Meradeth Teamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
EPPS v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 3:2021cv00018
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JOHAN EPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Escobar, Inc v. Dillard Hospitality Group et al
as 1:2020cv03033
Defendant:
Dillard Hospitality Group, Mr. Tauheed Epps, Mychel Dillard and others
Plaintiff:
Escobar, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Hagler Systems, Inc. et al v. Hagler Group Global, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Benjamin L. Hagler, Sr., Hagler Group Global, LLC, Lee Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Hagler Systems, Inc., David R. Hagler, Sr. and Robert S. Hagler, Sr.
Special Master:
Honorable Brian K. Epps
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Warren v. AT&T Corporate Offices of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Debra Fryer Simpson, Vanessa Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Tinika S. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPPS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03568
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY EPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. Emmons
as 1:2018cv00115
Petitioner:
Kenyon Epps
Respondent:
Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Einfeldt v. Mackelburg et al
as 1:2017cv04820
Petitioner:
Michael Einfeldt
Respondent:
Mackelburg, Vasquez, Cornejo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
