Cases 11 - 20 of 196
United States of America v. Hafner et al
as 1:2015cv00785
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Judith E. Hafner, Equable Ascent Financial LLC, Midland Funding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rochelle Daniel v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, et al
as 14-2627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE DANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC and VELOCITY PORTFOLIO GROUP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Onewest Bank, N.A. v. Pereira et al
as 2:2014cv04758
Defendant:
Clerk of the Suffolk County District Court, John Doe, Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Onewest Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. LEE et al
as 3:2014cv04432
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Defendant:
SANG JIK LEE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. AS NOMINEE FOR COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A., STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Richardson et al
as 3:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roger A. Richardson, Capital One Bank and Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Daniel v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv11117
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Daniel
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and Velocity Portfolio Group
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Velasquez v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio Velasquez
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and CIR Law Offices, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
