Cases 1 - 10 of 270
In re: May
as 23-1389
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL J. MAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
May v. United States, et al
as 23-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. SAMUEL J. MAY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, an agency of the United Staes, THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the United States and others
Berster (PS) v. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 1:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
Christina Garcia Berster
Defendant:
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
