Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Grace Adams, et al v. Springleaf Financial Service/, et al
as 13-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACE ADAMS
Plaintiff:
RONALD KERKSTRA, JAMES JETSON, JR., MATTHEW CRUISE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICE/AIG, fka Wilmington Finance/AIG, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND, LAMCO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams et al v. Springleaf Financial Service/AIG et al
as 4:2012cv10308
Plaintiff:
Grace Ellis Adams, Ronald Kerkstra, James Jetson, Jr and others
Defendant:
Springleaf Financial Service/AIG, US Bank NA/U.S. Bancorp , LAMCO and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Howard R. Griffin United States of America
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Grace Ellis Adams
Equistar Chemicals, LP v. Saco Int'l, Inc.
as 4:2011cv02517
Plaintiff:
Equistar Chemicals, LP
Defendant:
Saco Int'l, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Equistar Chemicals, LP v. United Polychem, Inc.
as 4:2010cv04813
Plaintiff:
Equistar Chemicals, LP
Defendant:
United Polychem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Equistar Chemicals, LP v. Polymer Packaging, Inc.
as 5:2009mc00042
Plaintiff:
Equistar Chemicals, LP
Defendant:
Polymer Packaging, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
