Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
AUSTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53818
Plaintiff:
DAVID ERIC AUSTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02740
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eric Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54552
Plaintiff:
ERIC AUSTIN STANLEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUSTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36412
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrian Delk v. Hardeman County Correctional, et al
as 19-6387
Defendant / Appellee:
KEINAENNA JACKSON, a Disciplinary Sergeant at HCCF, LATOYA LOUDEN, HCCF Corrections Officer (C/O), DORTHY ROBERTSON, a Unit Manager at HCCF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN DELK
Eric Austin v. USA
as 19-5651
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC AUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Austin v. Padgett et al
as 5:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
Eric Austin
Defendant:
FNU Padgett and Glen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luellan v. City Of Moscow, Tennessee, et al.
as 2:2017cv02271
Plaintiff:
Mark Luellan
Defendant:
City Of Moscow, Tennessee , Hardeman County , Eric Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv02035
Petitioner:
Eric Austin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
