Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Jones v. Carmartfl.com et al
as 1:2022cv20910
Defendant:
Carmartfl.com, Carmartfl, Jorge D. Rio and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Lorenzo Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Saunders v. Harrington
as 22-340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Gonzalez, Esq., William M. Harrington, Tamara Marshall and others
Richardson v. Hudson et al
as 1:2021cv06703
Plaintiff:
Brent Richardson
Defendant:
Hon. Sharon D. Hudson and DA of Kings County Eric Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saunders v. Gonzalez
as 21-2804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Gonzalez, Esq.
Saunders v. Harrington et al
as 1:2021cv06038
Plaintiff:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant:
William M. Harrington, Eric Gonzalez, Tamara Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Joblove et al
as 1:2021cv03686
Defendant:
Leonard Joblove, Eric Gonzalez and Howard Goodman
Plaintiff:
Christopher Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv03005
Defendant:
Douglas Kallen, Michael Norrito, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waite v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2021cv02506
Defendant:
ADA Jane Doe, Charles Nunez, Honorable Eric Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Waite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saunders v. Gonzalez
as 1:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant:
Eric Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stennett et al v. New York City Administration For Children's Services et al
as 1:2021cv01069
Defendant:
ACS Case worker N. Argan, New York City Administration For Children's Services, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Z.K. Kerr, S.C. Reynolds and Sherena Stennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
