Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Maisano v. Hall, et al.
as 3:2013cv01134
Defendant:
f/n/u Hall, Raner C. Collins, Corizon Health Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Corizon Health Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Inc., Wexford Medical Services, Inc., State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Scarsborough et al
as 4:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Drew Scarsborough, Frank DeClair, Doug LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tennille v. Dicken et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kemp Tennille
Defendant:
Kevin C. Dicken, Eric Holder, Prosecutorial Misconduct Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Salgado v. Hale et al
as 4:2012cv00141
Petitioner:
Odilan Salgado
Respondent:
David J. Hale and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Panetta et al
as 3:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Defendant:
Leon E. Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02393
Petitioner:
Richard Morrison
Respondent:
Eric Holder and Geauga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Golovin v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv13588
Petitioner:
Timour Golovin
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Walter M Ingram and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Wherry v. Tripi et al
as 1:2011cv02784
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Wherry, Sr.
Defendant:
Phillip J Tripi, Steven Deteilbach, Jeffrey Grondolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
