Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00505
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Gib Lewis Unit
as 9:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00982
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Fort Worth Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Fort Worth Sheriff's Dept. and Fort Worth Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Unknown Defendant
as 9:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Unknown defendant, C/O FNU Hicks, FNU Tunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2022cv00825
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson, Alaric Stone and Michael Marcenelle
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Lloyd J Austin, III, Linda Fagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Unknown Defendant
as 4:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Sgt. FNU Hicks, Capt. FNU Tunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
