Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Clervrain et al v. Fite et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmaunel Benjoassaint, Wislene Casir and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth L. Fite, Sarah B. Akins, Hon. J. Antonio DelCampo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Licari
Defendant:
Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
North Georgia Boating Club Inc. et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2019cv02263
Plaintiff:
North Georgia Boating Club Inc. and Kenneth R. Heyman
Defendant:
Dennis T. Brown, Laura Semanson, Gene Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03469
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Pennington et al
as 4:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Terry Eric Johnson
Defendant:
Frank Pennington, Lori T. Loncon, Robert Attridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Daugherty and LabMD, Inc.
Defendant:
Joel P. Adams, David J. Becker, Robert J. Boback and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Goodrich et al
as 5:2012cv00126
Petitioner:
Terry Eric Johnson
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich and Daniel M. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Goodrich et al
as 4:2012cv00270
Petitioner:
Terry Eric Johnson
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich and Daniel M. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Karpf et al
as 4:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
Terry Eric Johnson
Defendant:
Michael L. Karpf and Robert W. Attridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
