Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Arguela et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Jack Eric Jones
Defendant:
Neftal Arguela, Detective J. Perez, Detective J. Chinchilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Judge Michael Pearson et al
as 1:2021cv02574
Plaintiff:
Jack Eric Jones
Defendant:
Judge Michael Pearson, Detective J Chinchilla and Detective J Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Perez et al
as 8:2020cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jack Eric Jones
Defendant:
Glenarden Police Department and Officer Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Enoch Pratt Free Library
as 1:2016cv04110
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eric Jones
Defendant:
Enoch Pratt Free Library
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Jordan et al
as 1:2016cv02662
Plaintiff:
Eric Jones
Defendant:
Joshua Jordan , Russell J. Tonks , Baltimore Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv02663
Defendant:
Eric Jones , Joshua Jordan, Russell J. Tonks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00293
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health and Welfare Fund et al v. DeWayne Custom Painting, Inc.
as 8:2007cv03216
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund, Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 51 and Trustees of the Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 51 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
DeWayne Custom Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
