Cases
Davis, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARLA DAVIS and JALEN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3081
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis et al v. United States Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv01010
Defendant: Wichita Clinic, P.A., Klenda Mitchell Austerman Zuercher L.L.C., United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff: Carla Davis and Jalen Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3227
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3166
Plaintiff / Appellant: MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant / Appellee: KIM I. FLANNIGAN, AKA Kim M. Berger, AKA Kim M. Fowler, AKA Kim I. Martin, AKA Kim Martinez-Butts, KATHRYN H. VRATIL, in their nongovernmental capacities, ERIC MELGREN, in their non-governmental capacities and others
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee: DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Akers v. Flannigan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02042
Defendant: Kim I. Flannigan, Kathy S. Hill, J. Conover and others
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Akers v. Flannigan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03311
Defendant: Katherine Siereveld, Sarah Canty, Does Dental Department Employees and others
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?