Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Ross v. Conner et al
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
LaQuandra Erica Ross
Defendant:
Amanda Conner and Dwayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pryor v. Chestnut, et al
as 7:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Ms. Chestnut, Ms. Lynda Mood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Biro v. Flynn et al
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Defendant:
Timothy Flynn, Tavis Henry, Mike Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Daughtrey o/b/o K.T.D v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Erica Daughtrey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1st Advantage Federal Credit Union v. Mesa
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
1st Advantage Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Erica Maria Mesa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
ABNB Federal Credit Union v. Mesa
as 2:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
ABNB Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Erica Maria Mesa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Erica L. Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Langley Federal Credit Union v. Mesa
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Langley Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Erica Mesa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
