Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rosemarie Pesci v. Erik K Shinseki et al
as 5:2015cv00607
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Robert McDonald, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Erik K Shinseki and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Pesci
Pesci v. Shinseki et al
as 3:2014cv00835
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Pesci
Defendant:
Erik K. Shinseki , VA Loma Linda Healthcare System and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Meier v. Shinseki et al
as 3:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Meier
Defendant:
Erik K. Shinseki, E. Douglas Bradshaw, Suzanne C. Will and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Jim Navarro v. USA, et al
as 12-17586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Secretary of Social Security Administration and others
Ireneo Recinto, et al v. The U.S. Department of V.A., et al
as 11-16341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRENEO RECINTO, BIENVENIDO GALAS, Sr., RICARDO PINERO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Department of Veteran Affairs and W. SCOTT GOULD
Recinto et al
as 4:2010cv04542
Plaintiff:
Ireneo Recinto , Bienvenido Galas, Sr. , Ricardo Pinero and others
Defendant:
The United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Erik K. Shinseki and W. Scott Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CCA of Tenessee, LLC v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2009cv02442
Plaintiff:
CCA of Tenessee, LLC
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs, Erik K. Shinseki, Eric Lazare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
