Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02124
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pittman v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bobby James Pittman
Defendant:
Evans, John Doe and Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Keyser v. Estrada et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keyser
Defendant:
Earnest (Earnie) Estrada and Susan Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Lopez-Estrada v. Batts, et al.
as 2:2017cv02403
Petitioner:
Javier Lopez-Estrada
Respondent:
Myron L. Batts and Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Estrada v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02811
Movant:
Carmelo Estrada
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sarabia v. USA
as 2:2016cv00086
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tomas Estrada Sarabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Does et al
as 3:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
TAS Rights Management, LLC
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does, Various XYZ Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Abel Cuevas Alfaro et al v. Southland Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Abel Cuevas Alfaro , Josue Daniel Hernandez , Gabriel Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Southland Landscaping, Inc. and John French
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Friday et al v. Estrada et al
as 1:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Friday, Judith M. Friday, Fred Friday and others
Defendant:
Malcomb Robert Estrada, Malcomb Robert Estrada, Malcomb Robert Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
