Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 279
HUNTER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01071
Petitioner: EUGENE HUNTER
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNTER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01069
Petitioner: EUGENE HUNTER
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner: Eugene Dawson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff: KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant: GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MURRAY
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: BILLY EUGENE FORD
Defendant: JOHN MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Griffin v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff: Virgil Eugene Griffin and Virgil Griffin
Defendant: Ron Neal, Douglas Wardlow, Chelsea Grahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01653
Plaintiff: EUGENE WELLS
Defendant: YVONNE CHAMBERS, K. STORM and CHLOE WARGNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner: Kevin E Smith and Kevin Eugene Smith
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?