Cases 1 - 10 of 277
Dawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
Eugene Dawson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MURRAY
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
BILLY EUGENE FORD
Defendant:
JOHN MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Griffin v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Virgil Eugene Griffin and Virgil Griffin
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Douglas Wardlow, Chelsea Grahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01653
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WELLS
Defendant:
YVONNE CHAMBERS, K. STORM and CHLOE WARGNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Kevin E Smith and Kevin Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGHEE et al v. DOWELL et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL MCGHEE and EUGENE RADCLIFF
Defendant:
JORDAN DOWELL, JORDAN CARR, ZACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOTT v. COOK INCOPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Knott
Defendant:
COOK INCOPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
