Cases 1 - 10 of 325
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, David F. Zeyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pidde v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Eugene Pidde
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harkey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02981
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harkey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bland v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02625
Plaintiff:
Eugene Bland
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cazantzes v. Mowder et al.
as 5:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Eugene M. Cazantzes
Defendant:
Elizabeth Mowder, Thomas Mowder, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Truppa v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Eugene Truppa, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adler v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Eugene Charles Adler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Wilson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Ted Eugene Wilson and Patricia Wilson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
