Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Eugene v. Banks
as 6:2024cv00330
Defendant: Rene Banks
Plaintiff: Terry Eugene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00878
Petitioner: Steven Eugene Parker
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sier v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: William Eugene Sier
Defendant: Detention Officer Dotson, Detention Officer Roberts and Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roland v. Robbins et al
as 6:2024cv00282
Defendant: Michael Robbins and Grazanita
Plaintiff: Derrick Eugene Roland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delozier v. Pittsburg County Jail
as 6:2024cv00259
Plaintiff: Terrell Eugene Delozier
Defendant: Pittsburg County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00294
Respondent: Chris Rankins
Petitioner: Howard Eugene Peeples, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Defendant: Carolyn MacDonald, Lee Windsor, Paul Mazerolle and others
Plaintiff: Douglas Mastriano
Intervenor: Prof Eugene Volokh
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Travis v. Seminole Nation Tribal Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Ralph Eugene Travis
Respondent: Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?