Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cannon v. San Francisco Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv06778
Plaintiff:
Lady Benjamin Cannon
Defendant:
San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Sheriff's Department, City and County of San Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yuki Kobayashi v. Morgan McMullin
as 2:2019cv06591
Defendant:
Yeshia Braverman, Veronica Cervantes, Shaya Braverman and others
Plaintiff:
Yuki Kobayashi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Frederick Ramey v. Hector Pena Gomez et al
as 5:2021cv00694
Defendant:
Fast Eviction Service, Does 1-10, Hector Pena Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Frederick Ramey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Quarterspot, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00936
Plaintiff:
Graciela Williams and Graciela Williams Doing business as Tri-Star Evictions
Defendant:
DLI Assets Bravo, LLC and Quarterspot, Inc
Receiver:
Bradley D. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Legal Support Network v. Expert Evictions
as 5:2018cv01310
Defendant:
Expert Evictions
Plaintiff:
Legal Support Network and Legal Support Network doing business as Express Network
Ali Sharifi v. One Stop Eviction Collections, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03808
Defendant:
Andre Freeman and One Stop Eviction Collections, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ali Sharifi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arogant Hollywood et al v. Craig Doolittle et al
as 2:2016cv06459
Defendant:
Does, Carig Doolittle, Jennifer Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Helen Fairchild and Arogant Hollywood
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01657
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Ati Mogadam v. Fast Eviction Service
as 2:2014cv09245
Defendant:
Fast Eviction Service
Plaintiff:
Ati Mogadam
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
