Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al v. Allianz Underwriters Insurance, et al
as 15-1911
Plaintiff - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP
Defendant - Appellee: ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO, FKA Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co, ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO, as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, AMERICAN INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant - Appellant: COLUMBIA CASUALTY CO
Type: Contract Insurance
Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al v. Allianz Underwriters Insurance, et al
as 15-1910
Plaintiff - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP
Defendant - Appellee: ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO, FKA Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co, ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO, as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, AMERICAN INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant - Appellant: ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI SPA, DOMINION INSURANCE CO LTD, HARPER VERSICHERUNGS AG, FKA Harper Insurance Ltd, FKA Turegum Insurance Co and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al v. Allianz Underwriters Insurance, et al
as 15-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP
Defendant - Appellee: ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO, formerly known as Allianz Underwriters, Inc., FKA Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co, ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO, as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, AMERICAN INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant - Appellant: TIG INSURANCE CO, as successor by merger to International Insurance Company and UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO
Type: Contract Insurance
Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al v. Allianz Underwriters, et al
as 15-1777
Plaintiff - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP
Defendant - Appellee: ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS, FKA Allianz Underwriters, ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO, as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, AMERICAN INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant - Appellant: MOUNT MCKINLEY INSURANCE CO, FKA Gibraltar Casualty Co
Type: Contract Insurance
Henley v. Meyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01080
Plaintiff: Thomas Henley
Defendant: Executive Risk Indemnity Inc , Saul M Meyer, Matthew O'Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
GENERAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. v. EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06855
Plaintiff: GENERAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. and FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. v. Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv08235
Interpleader_plaintiff: Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
Interpleader_defendant: Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation, Alex Saavedra , Shomari Rick Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. et al v. Fieldbridge Associates L.L.C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv04354
Plaintiff: Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Copstat Security, L.L.C.
Defendant: Fieldbridge Associates L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
RQ Construction, Inc. et al v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01360
Plaintiff: RQ Construction, Inc. , RQ Manufacturing, LLC , Ecowall Manufacturing, LLC and others
Defendant: Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Aultman Health Foundation et al v. Executive Risk Indemnity Inc.
as 5:2013cv01025
Plaintiff: Aultman Health Foundation and Aultman Hospital
Defendant: Executive Risk Indemnity Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?