Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pennsylvania Public Utility Co, et al v. FERC
as 21-3243
Petitioner:
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
Intervenor:
MONITORING ANALYTICS LLC
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified:
EXELON CORP, EXELON GENERATION CO LLC, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. MI Holdings Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00641
Plaintiff:
Paulette M. Adams , James Bakula , Catherine M. Barton and others
Defendant:
MI Holdings Inc. , Mallinckrodt Inc. , Associates First Capital Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McClurg et al v. MI Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
Scott D. McClurg , Tracy L. McCarty, Larry Crum and others
Defendant:
MI Holdings, Inc., Mallinckrodt, Inc., Associates First Capital Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wexler v. Commonwealth Edison Co. et al
as 1:2007cv02318
Plaintiff:
Saul R. Wexler and Saul R. Wexler
Defendant:
Commonwealth Edison Co., Commonwealth Edison Co., Commonwealth Edison Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Schafer et al v. Exelon Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02316
Plaintiff:
David Schafer, David Schafer, David Schafer and others
Defendant:
Exelon Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Co., Ameren Cilco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
