Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Marjory Thomas Osborn-Vincent, et al v. American Express Financial, et al
as 21-2210
Plaintiff:
Isabella Mork, Paul Russell, Richard Thoresen and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Financial Corporation, Sued as: American Express Financial Service Corp., IDS Life Insurance Company, American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Osborn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3083
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Irving H. Picard, Trust
as 17-3083
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Appellee:
Standard Chartered Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A., FKA American Express Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A., FKA American Express Bank (Luxembourg) S.A., as represented by its Liquidator Hanspeter Kramer, Hanspeter Kramer, in his capacities as, Standard Chartered International (USA) Ltd., FKA American Express Bank, Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, FKA American Express Bank International
Picard v. Standard Chartered Financial S
as 17-1374
Respondent:
Standard Chartered Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A., FKA American Express Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A., FKA American Express Bank (Luxembourg) S.A., as represented by its Liquidator Hanspeter Kramer, Hanspeter Kramer, in his capacities as, Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, FKA American Express Bank International and Standard Chartered International (USA) Ltd., FKA American Express Bank, Ltd.
Petitioner:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Picard v. Standard Chartered Financial S
as 17-1374
Petitioner:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Respondent:
Standard Chartered Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A., FKA American Express Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A., FKA American Express Bank (Luxembourg) S.A., as represented by its Liquidator Hanspeter Kramer, Hanspeter Kramer, in his capacities as liqu, Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, FKA American Express Bank International and Standard Chartered International (USA) Ltd., FKA American Express Bank, Ltd.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hadi v. Pinal County Community College District Governing Board et al.,
as 2:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Saleem Hadi
Defendant:
Pinal County Community College District Governing Board, Central Arizona College, Higher One Holdings Incorporated and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lanham et al v. Higher One Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01811
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lanham and Larry Forman
Defendant:
Higher One Holdings, Inc. , Bancorp Bank and Wright Express Financial Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: MDL 2407 In Re: Higher One OneAccount Marketing and Sales Practices
Massey et al v. Higher One Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01808
Plaintiff:
Jill Massey and Lee McWhorter
Defendant:
Higher One Holdings, Inc., Bancorp Bank, Urban Trust Bank and others
Cause Of Action: MDL 2407 In Re: Higher One OneAccount Marketing and Sales Practices
Higher One OneAccount Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 3:2012md02407
Plaintiff:
Ashley B. Parker , Bailey Bates , Rachel Hancock and others
Defendant:
Higher One Holdings, Inc. , Bancorp Bank and Wright Express Financial Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: MDL 2407 In Re: Higher One OneAccount Marketing and Sales Practices
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
