Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hanna v. Peed
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Duriel Hanna
Defendant:
Chief Judge F. Gates Peed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dante Hayward v. Brian Mundy, et al
as 23-12214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE BENJAMIN HAYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MUNDY, CALEB GROVENSTEIN, F. GATES PEED and others
Hayward v. Peed et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Judge F. Gates Peed, Brian A. Deal and K-9 Sgt. Brian Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Benjamin Hayward v. Brian Mundy, et al
as 23-11448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE BENJAMIN HAYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MUNDY, Sergeant of K-9, Effingham Sheriff's Department, individual and official capacities, DEPUTY CALEB GROVENSTEIN, Effingham County Sheriff's Department, individual and official capacities, JUDGE F. GATES PEED, Individual and official capacities and others
Hayward v. Mundy et al
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Brian Mundy, Deputy Caleb Grovenstein, Judge F. Gates Peed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Thompson et al
as 6:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Henry Lamar Lester
Defendant:
Cpt. Kenny Thompson, Lovett Bennett, Jr., Judge F. Gates Peed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Peed et al
as 4:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Grady R. Williams
Defendant:
F. Gates Peed and Richard A. Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Peed
as 6:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
Robert Curtis Finch
Respondent:
F. Gates Peed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Ogeechee Judicial Circuit of Effingham County et al
as 4:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Grady R. Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Ogeechee Judicial Circuit of Effingham County, F. Gates Peed, Richard A. Mallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Peed
as 6:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Carlton Smith
Defendant:
F. Gates Peed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
