Cases 1 - 4 of 4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22312
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC and APPROXIMATELY $1,642,755.55 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN F&M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ACCOUNT NOS. 5106230, 200025521, AND 1005278 HELD IN THE NAME OF KENT D. WARNING DBA PAYOFF ACCOUNT SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Proceeds of F&M Bank Account Number XXX3586 in the amount of $14,224.15 in United States Currency
as 4:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Proceeds of F&M Bank Account Number XXX3586 in the amount of $14,224.15 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3372
United States of America v. Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee, 4676 Highway 41N, Springfield, Tennessee, 204 Lawrence Lane, Springfield, Tennessee and others
Claimant:
Marie Murphy, in her capacity as Special Deputy Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance for the State of Tennessee, and as Statutory Liquidator/Receiver of Smart Data Solutions, LLC, et. al , F&M Bank , Bart S Posey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. F & M Bank Cashier's Check in the amount of $38,705.85
as 1:2007cv00088
Defendant:
F & M Bank Cashier's Check in the amount of $38,705.85
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
