Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Immanuel F. Sanchez v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv09084
Defendant:
Armen Pezeshkian, Richard Bracken, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Immanuel F. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Immanuel F. Sanchez v. Manuel L. Real et al
as 2:2019cv05951
Defendant:
Kiry K. Gray, R. Smith, Illene Bernal and others
Plaintiff:
Immanuel F. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Immanuel F. Sanchez v. Manuel L. Real et al
as 2:2019cv06015
Defendant:
Kiry K. Gray, R. Smith, Illene Bernal and others
Plaintiff:
Immanuel F. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Immanuel F. Sanchez v. State of California et al
as 2:2018cv06107
Defendant:
El Monte Comprehensive Health Center, Julio Iniquez, Armen Pezeshkian and others
Plaintiff:
Immanuel F. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Elmer Moreno Mendoza et al v. F. Sanchez et al
as 2:2016cv08159
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Allen, Correctional Officer Allen, Sgt D. Godfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Elmer Moreno Mendoza
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Weir v. Roy et al
as 1:2014cv01739
Plaintiff:
Archie Weir
Defendant:
Mathew Roy, Nestor Barajas, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
