Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff: JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant: CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff: TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee: CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01460
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. Radec Corporation
as 12-4831
Plaintiff - Appellant: Patrick Mendez, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated, Jerry T. Griffo, Jr., Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant: Abeck Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Radec Corporation, Mark Shortino, Raymond Shortino and others
Mendez v. Radec Corporation
as 12-4845
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Patrick Mendez, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated, Jerry T. Griffo, Jr., Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant: Abeck Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Tradesource, Tek Systems, Techengineering Services, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Radec Corporation, Mark Shortino and Raymond Shortino
New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Association, Inc. et al v. State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01523
Plaintiff: Diane Davis, David L. Faile, Louis Giampaglia and others
Defendant: Caroline W. Ahl, Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sudler v. City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant: Terence Sudler
Defendant: Bureau Chief, Department Of Corrections Custody Management & Environmental Health Department from June 2005 to July 2006, Coordinator New York City Department Of Corrections Inmate Records, from June 2005 to July 2006, John Doe, Clerical Staff Worker at Rikers Island who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) and others
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Martin F. Horn, of the New York City Department of Corrections (NYCDOC), Warden, Who was in charge of Plaintiff's Correctional Facility at Rikers Island and others
Batthany v. Horn
as 11-1216
Plaintiff - Appellant: Timothy Batthany
Defendant - Appellee: John Doe Clerical Staff Worker(s) at Plaintiff's NYC DOC Correctional Facility, who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Richard Roe Supervisor of John Doe Clerical Staff Worker(s) at Plaintiff'sNYC DOC Correctional Facility, who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), John Does, Employees of the City of New York and others
United States of America v. Failing
as 10-3330
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Vincent Failing
Mendez, et al v. The Radec Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2003cv06342
Plaintiff: Patrick Mendez , Jerry T. Griffo, Jr. , Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant: The Radec Corporation , Mark Shortino , Raymond Shortino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?