Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Farrell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Chad M Farrell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARRELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02228
Plaintiff:
REMONA FARRELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BELCHER et al v. FARRELL et al
as 1:2022cv01791
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W BELCHER and JENNIFER L. KAPPES
Defendant:
DAVID FARRELL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SWARTZ RONDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrell v. Buss et al
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Chad M Farrell
Defendant:
Dawn Buss, Ron Neal, Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHULETTA et al v. MER CORPORATION
as 1:2020cv02264
Plaintiff:
ALANA CAMPOS SOUZA, JOANNA KRUPA, JENNIFER ARCHULETTA and others
Defendant:
MER CORPORATION D/B/A DANCERS SHOWCLUB and MER CORPORATION doing business as DANCERS SHOWCLUB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
HAYCRAFT v. WARDEN
as 2:2020cv00312
Petitioner:
FARRELL HAYCRAFT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ambrosetti v. Oregon Catholic Press et al
as 3:2020cv00371
Defendant:
Oregon Catholic Press and Bernadette Farrell
Plaintiff:
Vincent A Ambrosetti
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
FARRELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00222
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DONALD FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
