Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 4:2024cv04064
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lambert v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Mario Lambert
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monroe v. FCI Terre Haute
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Joseph Monroe
Defendant:
FCI Terre Haute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelsrud v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelly Jo Nelsrud
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carrillo et al v. Brendan Mortgage, Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv16613
Plaintiff:
Emilio Carrillo and Michelle Ann Carrillo
Defendant:
Brendan Mortgage, Incorporated doing business as Brendan Financial, Scott Robert Barfuss, Father & Sons Home Improvement II, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Belton v. USA
as 1:2023cv01370
Petitioner:
Emanucel Belton
Respondent:
USA and Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Nekia Turner
Defendant:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Licata v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01321
Petitioner:
Joseph Licata
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
