Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 272
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Rodney C. Compton
Defendant: J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff: Londel Sanders
Defendant: Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Londel Sanders
Defendant: Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jenkins v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Keyshaun Jenkins
Defendant: FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Aric Stutler
Respondent: FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stutler v. FCI McDowell
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner: Aric Stutler
Respondent: FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: Charles Muhammad Cunningham and Charles Muhammad Abdus-Shaheed Cunningham
Defendant: FCI Beckley, Kitchen Manager Bailey, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. FCI Gilmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00339
Petitioner: Wesley Wood
Respondent: Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lafond v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00718
Petitioner: Juvonta Lafond
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?