Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wood v. FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Wesley Wood
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Brown, Warden et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Ruben Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Brown, Warden and FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leveke v. Maricopa County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Cody Ray Leveke
Respondent:
Maricopa County Sheriff and Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McNulty v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Jayson McNulty
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. Warden FCI Gilmer
as 3:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dickerson v. Warden FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Larry Dickerson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lara Suarez v. Warden Wolfe FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Sergio Manuel Lara Suarez
Respondent:
Warden Wolfe FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
